🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that switching their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced favorable results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."